2002 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (270 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 368 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (395 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XJR | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 395 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 2033 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 80 L |