2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Jeep | Jaguar |
Model | Wrangler | XJ |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3157 mm |