2002 Mahindra Bolero vs. 1970 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercury Comet (137 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 392 kg more than 1970 Mercury Comet.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercury Comet (319 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1970 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mahindra Bolero | 1970 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mercury |
| Model | Bolero | Comet |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 2523 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1390 kg |
