2002 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (167 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 86 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. (240 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mercedes-Benz E 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Mercedes-Benz Oldsmobile
Model E Cutlass
Year Released 2002 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 4343 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 167 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 305 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1572 kg 1486 kg
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2750 mm