2002 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 652 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi eK | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | eK | Armada |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3140 mm |
