2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 246 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2011 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
Model | Space Wagon | CTS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2880 mm |