2002 Renault Clio vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Pontiac Firebird (255 HP) has 159 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 630 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Renault | Pontiac |
Model | Clio | Firebird |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 255 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |