2002 Renault Clio vs. 1974 Seat 133

To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Seat 133 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1974 Seat 133. (43 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 340 kg more than 1974 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 133. (55 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications: