2002 Renault Clio vs. 1977 Seat 133

To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Seat 133 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1977 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1977 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 204 kg more than 1977 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1977 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications: