2002 Renault Megane vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Megane (74 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Megane weights approximately 650 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Megane (99 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Megane | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Renault | Tata |
Model | Megane | Nano |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 99 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.8 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |