2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 804 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (427 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. 2004 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ has manual transmission. 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Suzuki | Ford |
| Model | Wagon R+ | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 71.1 mm | 90.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.9 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 1662 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2620 mm |
