2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 289 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (265 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 has automatic transmission and 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt has manual transmission. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
Make Alfa Romeo Chevrolet
Model 166 Cobalt
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2959 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 217 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 265 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 87.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72.6 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 1261 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.3 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 19.4 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 13 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 69 L 49 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]