2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 352 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Because 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Mazda |
Model | BZ-2001 | 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6900 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2639 mm |