2003 BMW X5 vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 124 kg more than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 79 L |