2003 BMW X5 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | X5 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2580 mm |