2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1975 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1975 Pontiac Trans Am. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1975 Pontiac Trans Am.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Pontiac Trans Am. (434 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Pontiac Trans Am.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 1975 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Cadillac | Pontiac |
Model | CTS-V | Trans Am |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 6556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 104.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |