2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 416 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS-V | Rogue |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |