2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1952 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 370 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1952 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | Campagnola |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |