2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1975 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1975 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
| Model | CTS | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 3689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2830 mm |
