2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1984 Renault 25
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1984 Renault 25. (122 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 420 kg more than 1984 Renault 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 25. (193 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1984 Renault 25 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | CTS | 25 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 34 L |
