2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 645 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | CTS | Clio |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
