2003 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford 49 would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 856 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SSR (449 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chevrolet SSR | 2001 Ford 49 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | SSR | 49 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5316 cc | 3899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 449 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2620 mm |
