2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1978 Volvo 240

To start off, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (142 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.

Because 1978 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager 1978 Volvo 240
Make Chrysler Volvo
Model Grand Voyager 240
Year Released 2003 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2399 cc 2127 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 142 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 160 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2650 mm