2003 Ford Ka vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |