2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1946 Jaguar Mark IV
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 147 kg more than 1946 Jaguar Mark IV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1946 Jaguar Mark IV | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | Mark IV |
Year Released | 2003 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3060 mm |