2003 Ford Puma vs. 2006 Opel Astra

To start off, 2006 Opel Astra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Opel Astra. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Opel Astra weights approximately 242 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Opel Astra. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Opel Astra.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Puma 2006 Opel Astra
Make Ford Opel
Model Puma Astra
Year Released 2003 2006
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 1364 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 99 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 125 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1038 kg 1280 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 2000 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 52 L