2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 460 kg more than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Land Rover | Land Rover |
Model | Range Rover | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 22.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 88 L |