2003 MG ZR vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZR would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C3 weights approximately 106 kg more than 2003 MG ZR.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C3 (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZR | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | MG | Citroen |
Model | ZR | C3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10 seconds | 14.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1126 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |