2003 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Bluebird | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |