2003 Oldsmobile Alero vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero (139 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 345 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2003 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Oldsmobile Alero | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Alero | 220 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |