2003 Peugeot 106 vs. 1964 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2003 Peugeot 106 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 2003 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 490 kg more than 2003 Peugeot 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Peugeot 106. (87 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Peugeot 106. 1964 Ford Zodiac has automatic transmission and 2003 Peugeot 106 has manual transmission. 2003 Peugeot 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Ford Zodiac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Peugeot 106 | 1964 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Peugeot | Ford |
| Model | 106 | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |
