2003 Renault Megane vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Megane | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Megane | XC90 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2433 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 93.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2720 mm |