2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2001 Subaru HM-01
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Subaru HM-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Subaru HM-01 would be higher. Both 2003 Subaru R2 and 2001 Subaru HM-01 are equipped with a 658 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Subaru HM-01 (45 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Subaru HM-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Subaru HM-01 weights approximately 745 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru R2 (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Subaru HM-01. (57 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Subaru R2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Subaru HM-01.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Subaru R2 | 2001 Subaru HM-01 | |
Make | Subaru | Subaru |
Model | R2 | HM-01 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2320 mm |