2004 Acura TL vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Acura TL. (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura TL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook. 2010 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 2004 Acura TL has manual transmission. 2004 Acura TL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Acura | Saturn |
Model | TL | Outlook |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |