2004 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1962 Ford Capri
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 weights approximately 297 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Ford Capri (185 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Alfa Romeo 147. (181 Nm). This means 1962 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Alfa Romeo 147.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1962 Ford Capri | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 147 | Capri |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
