2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo would be higher.
Because 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lamborghini |
| Model | 156 | Marco Polo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
