2004 Alpina B3 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Alpina B3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alpina B3 weights approximately 676 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Alpina B3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Alpina B3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Alpina B3 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alpina | Zastava |
Model | B3 | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |