2004 Audi A6 vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 1047 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1962 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Audi | Mini |
| Model | A6 | MK I |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2040 mm |
