2004 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 77 kg more than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | C-Max |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2648 mm |