2004 Audi TT vs. 1978 BMW 725
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1978 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1978 BMW 725.
Because 1978 BMW 725 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 BMW 725. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 BMW 725. (215 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 BMW 725.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1978 BMW 725 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | 725 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2810 mm |