2004 BMW 120 vs. 1958 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2004 BMW 120 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Seville (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2004 BMW 120. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 875 kg more than 2004 BMW 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 120 | 1958 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 120 | Seville |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |