2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1955 Fiat 500
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 1955 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1955 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1955 Fiat 500 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | CTS | 500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 569 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1290 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |
