2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | ST 460 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2580 mm |