2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1992 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,408 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1992 Opel Omega | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Aveo | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 2408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2740 mm |