2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 552 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Blazer | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 127 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 45 L |