2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2009 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. (69 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 874 kg more than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | Blazer | Sirion |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 40 L |