2004 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Colorado | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Colorado | Combo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 126 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 52 L |