2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 3,423 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 625 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Equinox | Baleno |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3423 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2490 mm |