2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Sentia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Sentia would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 82 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.

Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 1996 Mazda Sentia
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Monte Carlo Sentia
Year Released 2004 1996
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3392 cc 2952 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 180 HP 0 HP
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 77.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1518 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 70 L