2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 747 kg more than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C
Make Chevrolet Alfa Romeo
Model TrailBlazer 6C
Year Released 2004 1939
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4163 cc 2442 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 275 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4600 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2247 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 5280 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1920 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 3280 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 77 L